Google is indexing Flash. Yahoo soon to follow.
They've been playing with this for a while. I first noticed Flash searches coming up a few weeks ago. We had a client present us with a very detailed 27-page document containing content for his website. After spending probably 40 hours on his project, including structuring the website around the outline of his content, something just wasn't sitting right with me on the content. I started Googling some of the distinctive phrases, and lo and behold, the entire thing had been ripped from a Flash site in the UK. We'd had discussions about this before, about the ethics of presenting other sites' work as his own, and had told him previously that we just weren't going to rip off other sites. A few days after the original ethics discussion, he mumbled something about needing to make a few text changes, but didn't mention that we were going to have to restructure the ENTIRE FREAKING WEBSITE. When Rich sent him an email about our discovery (I was too furious, we've been swamped and the last thing I needed to find out was that I'd wasted large amounts of time), he claimed that he'd never intended for the 27-page document to be the actual website content, but that he really needed the websites we're doing for him up in a hurry. We still haven't received new content.
This isn't the first time we've had funny business with a website. We had a small business a while back that hadn't finished paying us for the work we did for him. About a year after we did a site for him, we got an email from a guy claiming that he had taken over the company and needed the website rebranded for his new needs, and it needed to be done as quickly as possible, so how much? After several emails back and forth, and calling someone that worked for the original company, we established that not only had the guy not taken over the company, but he had been in talks with the company to buy the rights to their website and then hire us to rebrand it, after he'd paid the company enough money so that they could pay us for the outstanding bill.
And then there was our dentist, who had a web designer offer to rework a website he'd done for another dentist (essentially, just change the names and some of the text) for the low low price of something like $6,000.
A lot of this leaves me wondering - at what point does the template a web designer uses to build a website stop, and the content owned by the customer begin? One of the big time-savers on doing design work is being able to reuse code, and maybe even tweak some existing graphic arts work to make it fit the new project (it's amazing what a new color scheme will do for a site). But at what point are we stealing from our old clients to save time on new projects?